Systematic literature review of treatments used for refractory or unexplained chronic cough in adults.

BACKGROUND: Refractory or unexplained chronic cough (RCC or UCC) is difficult to manage and is usually treated by the off-label use of drugs approved for other indications. OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this systematic literature review (SLR) were to identify and characterize the current published body of evidence for the efficacy and safety of treatments for RCC or UCC. METHODS: The SLR was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The SLRs pre-defined population included patients ≥18 years of age who were diagnosed with chronic cough. The review was not restricted to any intervention type or study comparator, nor by timeframe. RESULTS: A total of 20 eligible publications from 19 unique trials were included. Seventeen of these trials were randomized controlled trials and most (14/17) were placebo-controlled. There was considerable variability between trials in the definition of RCC or UCC, participant exclusion and inclusion criteria, outcome measurement timepoints, and the safety and efficacy outcomes assessed. Several trials identified significant improvements in cough frequency, severity, or health-related quality of life measures while participants were on treatment, although these improvements did not persist in any of the studies that included a post-treatment follow-up timepoint. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of an approved therapy, placebo remains the most common comparator in trials of potential RCC or UCC treatments. The between-study comparability of the published evidence is limited by heterogeneity of study design, study populations, and outcomes measures, as well as by concerns regarding study size and risk of bias.

Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of the FAERS Database 2020-2023.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio. RESULTS: Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue.

The effect of combining an inhaled corticosteroid and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist on human airway epithelial cells in vitro.

BACKGROUND: Airway epithelial cells (AECs) are a major component of local airway immune responses. Direct effects of type 2 cytokines on AECs are implicated in type 2 asthma, which is driven by epithelial-derived cytokines and leads to airway obstruction. However, evidence suggests that restoring epithelial health may attenuate asthmatic features. METHODS: We investigated the effects of passive sensitisation on IL-5, NF-κB, HDAC-2, ACh, and ChAT in human bronchial epithelial cells (HBEpCs) and the effects of fluticasone furoate (FF) and umeclidinium (UME) alone and in combination on these responses. RESULTS: IL-5 and NF-κB levels were increased, and that of HDAC-2 reduced in sensitised HEBpCs. Pretreatment with FF reversed the effects of passive sensitisation by concentration-dependent reduction of IL-5, resulting in decreased NF-κB levels and restored HDAC-2 activity. Addition of UME enhanced these effects. Sensitized HEBpCs also exhibited higher ACh and ChAT levels. Pretreatment with UME significantly reduced ACh levels, and addition of FF caused a further small reduction. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed that passive sensitisation of AECs results in an inflammatory response with increased levels of IL-5 and NF-κB, reduced levels of HDAC-2, and higher levels of ACh and ChAT compared to normal cells. Combining FF and UME was found to be more effective in reducing IL-5, NF-κB, and ACh and restoring HDAC-2 compared to the individual components. This finding supports adding a LAMA to established ICS/LABA treatment in asthma and suggests the possibility of using an ICS/LAMA combination when needed.

The Impact of Thermal Water in Asthma and COPD: A Systematic Review According to the PRISMA Statement.

BACKGROUND: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are global health challenges leading to substantial morbidity and mortality. While existing guidelines emphasize evidence-based treatments, the potential therapeutic role of thermal water (TW) inhalation remains under-investigated. METHODS: This systematic review followed PRISMA-P guidelines and sought to evaluate the impact of TW in asthma and COPD. A thorough literature search, performed up to May 2023, encompassed in vitro, in vivo, randomized controlled trial (RCT), non-RCT, and observational studies. RESULTS: The review included 12 studies reporting different findings. In vitro studies suggested TW could enhance antioxidant capacity and cell proliferation. In a murine model of non-atopic asthma, TW inhalation reduced airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation. RCTs in COPD patients indicated mixed effects, including improved quality of life, reduced airway oxidant stress, and enhanced exercise tolerance. Asthma patients exposed to water aerosols exhibited improved lung function and reduced airway inflammation. Non-RCTs showed improved lung function and antioxidant activity after TW therapy. Additionally, observational studies reported enhanced lung function and reduced airway inflammation. CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests potential benefits of TW therapy in asthma and COPD. However, limited high-quality RCTs and concerns regarding occupational TW exposure necessitate further investigation. While TW therapy offers a non-invasive treatment, its therapeutic potential still needs definitive demonstration. Future research should therefore prioritize well-designed RCTs to thoroughly establish the efficacy and safety of TW as a potential therapeutic intervention for asthma and COPD.

Biologics for asthma and risk of pneumonia.

OBJECTIVE: Modification of the immune system with biologics raises theoretical concerns about the risk of infections but it is still unclear whether currently routinely used biologics in severe asthma may facilitate the development of pneumonia. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab are associated with pneumonia in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was performed using adverse event (AE) reports submitted to FAERS from January 2020 to September 30, 2023. MedDRA was used to identify infections and infestations and then pneumonia cases. ROR and PRR were used to measure disproportionality. RESULTS: The percentage of reported cases of pneumonia compared to infections and infestations was highest for mepolizumab (36.8%), followed by omalizumab (32.6%), benralizumab (19.2%) and dupilumab (5.7%). We found a moderate or strong signal for increased risk of pneumonia with mepolizumab (ROR = 3.74, 95%CI 3.50-4.00), omalizumab (ROR = 3.26, 95%CI 3.06-3.49) and benralizumab (ROR = 2.65, 95%CI 2.49-2.83). CONCLUSIONS: Mepolizumab, omalizumab and benralizumab, but not dupilumab, were associated with high odds of reporting pneumonia. Our results represent only potential associations between these biologics and pneumonia but not causality. The nature of the FAERS database is such that the cause of the reported events is uncertain. Therefore, we can only roughly estimate the incidence of AEs by the signal strength (ROR value). Nevertheless, although causality could not be assessed, the signal from our study is interesting. We believe it deserves to be further substantiated by real-world studies with robust designs.

Investigational thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors for the treatment of asthma: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Severe asthma patients often remain uncontrolled despite high-intensity therapies. Biological therapies targeting thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), a key player in asthma pathogenesis, have emerged as potential options. Currently, the only TSLP inhibitor approved for the treatment of severe asthma is the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 2λ anti-TSLP monoclonal antibody (mAb) tezepelumab. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review assesses the efficacy and safety of investigational TSLP inhibitors across different stages of development for asthma treatment. EXPERT OPINION: TSLP contributes to airway inflammation, making it a pivotal therapeutic target. Ecleralimab, an inhaled antibody fragment antigen binding, shows promising evidence in enhancing efficacy and reducing systemic adverse events. SAR443765, with its NANOBODY® formulation and bispecific inhibition of TSLP and IL-13, offers improved tissue penetration and efficacy. The mAB TQC2731 exhibits high in vitro bioactivity, and the strength of the mAb UPB-101 is to act against the TSLP receptor. Some studies include mild and moderate asthma patients, suggesting the potential for extending biological therapy to non-severe patients. This systematic review highlights the potential of TSLP inhibitors as valuable additions to asthma treatment, even in milder forms of the disease. Future research and cost-reduction efforts are needed to expanding access to these promising therapies.

Use of human airway smooth muscle in vitro and ex vivo to investigate drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders.

Isolated airway smooth muscle has been extensively investigated since 1840 to understand the pharmacology of airway diseases. There has often been poor predictability from murine experiments to drugs evaluated in patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, the use of isolated human airways represents a sensible strategy to optimise the development of innovative molecules for the treatment of respiratory diseases. This review aims to provide updated evidence on the current uses of isolated human airways in validated in vitro methods to investigate drugs in development for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders. This review also provides historical notes on the pioneering pharmacological research on isolated human airway tissues, the key differences between human and animal airways, as well as the pivotal differences between human medium bronchi and small airways. Experiments carried out with isolated human bronchial tissues in vitro and ex vivo replicate many of the main anatomical, pathophysiological, mechanical and immunological characteristics of patients with asthma or COPD. In vitro models of asthma and COPD using isolated human airways can provide information that is directly translatable into humans with obstructive lung diseases. Regardless of the technique used to investigate drugs for the treatment of chronic obstructive respiratory disorders (i.e., isolated organ bath systems, videomicroscopy and wire myography), the most limiting factors to produce high-quality and repeatable data remain closely tied to the manual skills of the researcher conducting experiments and the availability of suitable tissue.

Hyperglycaemia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) may coexist with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Patients with COPD have an increased risk of developing T2DM compared with a control but, on the other side, hyperglycaemia and DM have been associated with reduced predicted levels of lung function. The mechanistic relationships between these two diseases are complicated, multifaceted, and little understood, yet they can impact treatment strategy. The potential risks and benefits for patients with T2DM treated with pulmonary drugs and the potential pulmonary risks and benefits for patients with COPD when taking antidiabetic drugs should always be considered. The interaction between the presence and/or treatment of COPD, risk of infection, presence and/or treatment of T2DM and risk of acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPDs) can be represented as a vicious circle; however, several strategies may help to break this circle. The most effective approach to simultaneously treating T2DM and COPD is to interfere with the shared inflammatory substrate, thus targeting both lung inflammation (COPD) and vascular inflammation (DM). In any case, it is always crucial to establish glycaemic management since the reduction in lung function found in people with diabetes might decrease the threshold for clinical manifestations of COPD. In this article, we examine possible connections between COPD and T2DM as well as pharmacological strategies that could focus on these connections.

Advances in adrenergic receptors for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: 2023 update.

INTRODUCTION: Strong scientific evidence and large experience support the use of ß2-agonists for the symptomatic alleviation of COPD. Therefore, there is considerable effort in discovering highly potent and selective ß2-agonists. AREAS COVERED: Recent research on novel ß2-agonists for the treatment of COPD. A detailed literature search was performed in two major databases (PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus) up to September 2023." EXPERT OPINION: Compounds that preferentially activate a Gs- or ß-arrestin-mediated signaling pathway via ß- adrenoceptors (ARs) are more innovative. Pepducins, which target the intracellular region of ß2-AR to modulate receptor signaling output, have the most interesting profile from a pharmacological point of view. They stabilize the conformation of the ß2-AR and influence its signaling by interacting with the intracellular receptor-G protein interface. New bifunctional drugs called muscarinic antagonist-ß2 agonist (MABA), which have both muscarinic receptor (mAChR) antagonism and ß2-agonist activity in the same molecule, are a new opportunity. However, all tested compounds have been shown to act predominantly as mAChR antagonists or ß2-agonists. An intriguing idea is to utilize allosteric modulators that bind to ß2-ARs at sites different than those bound by orthosteric ligands to augment or reduce the signaling transduced by the orthosteric ligand.

What role will ensifentrine play in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients? Implications from recent clinical trials.

Data from the phase III ENHANCE clinical trials provide compelling evidence that ensifentrine, an inhaled 'bifunctional' dual phosphodiesterase 3/4 inhibitor, can provide additional benefit to existing treatments in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and represents a 'first-in-class' drug having bifunctional bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory activity in a single molecule. Ensifentrine, generally well tolerated, can provide additional bronchodilation when added to muscarinic receptor antagonists or ß2-agonists and reduce the exacerbation risk. This information allows us to consider better the possible inclusion of ensifentrine in the future treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. However, there is less information on whether it provides additional benefit when added to inhaled corticosteroid or 'triple therapy' and, therefore, when this drug is best utilized in clinical practice.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the name for a group of lung conditions that cause breathing difficulties/airflow limitations. The airflow limitation is not completely reversible and is associated with a state of chronic inflammation of lung tissue. Treatment of the disease is still heavily dependent on the use of medications called bronchodilators and corticosteroids. However, corticosteroids have little-to-no impact on the underlying inflammation in most COPD patients. Therefore, innovative anti-inflammatory approaches are required. In this context, single molecules that are capable of simultaneously inducing bronchodilation, relaxing the muscles in the lungs and widening the airways (bronchi), and anti-inflammatory activity are a highly intriguing possibility for treating COPD. One approach is to develop drugs that can simultaneously inhibit enzymes called phosphodiesterase (PDE)3 and PDE4. Enzymes are proteins that help speed up metabolism, or the chemical reactions in our bodies. PDE4 inhibitors are intracellular enzymes (work inside the cell) expressed in most inflammatory cells, even in neutrophils (a type of white blood cells), which are involved in the pathogenesis of COPD, where an infection turns into a disease. However, its inhibition does not produce severe bronchodilator effects, which is instead obtained by inhibiting PDE3, the PDE isoenzyme (a different form of the same enzyme) that is predominantly expressed in airway smooth muscle cells. A treatment called ensifentrine is a dual PDE3/4 inhibitor (inhibits both PDE3 and PDE4). Two recent phase III studies (ENHANCE-1 and ENHANCE-2) have shown that it induces significant bronchodilation and reduces the risk of COPD worsening, exerting an anti-inflammatory effect. Data from the ENHANCE studies also showed the benefit of adding ensifentrine to treatment with bronchodilators. Certainly, the drug represents a useful therapeutic option, but further clinical studies are needed to be able to correctly position ensifentrine in the context of regular COPD treatment.

Clinically Important Deterioration (CID) and Ageing in COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis According to PRISMA Statement.

Purpose: Clinically important deterioration (CID) is a composite endpoint developed to quantify the impact of pharmacological treatment in clinical trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), also showing a prognostic value. CID is defined as any of the following condition: forced expiratory volume in 1 s decrease ≥100 mL from baseline, and/or St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score increase ≥4-unit from baseline, and/or the occurrence of a moderate-to-severe exacerbation of COPD. Although most COPD patients experience a clinical worsening as they get older, to date, no specific studies assessed the correlation between ageing and CID in COPD. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impact of ageing on CID in COPD patients. Patients and Methods: Data obtained from 55219 COPD patients were extracted from 17 papers, mostly post-hoc analyses. A pairwise meta-analysis and a meta-regression analysis were performed according to PRISMA-P guidelines to quantify the impact of pharmacological therapy on CID and to determine whether ageing might modulate the risk of CID in COPD patients. Results: Inhaled treatments resulted generally effective in reducing the risk of CID in COPD (relative risk: 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.79-0.84; P < 0.001). The meta-regression analysis indicated a trend toward significance (P = 0.063) in the linear relationship between age and the risk of CID. Of note, age significantly (P < 0.05) increased the risk of CID when associated with lower post-bronchodilator FEV1. These results were not affected by a significant risk of bias. Conclusion: This quantitative synthesis suggests that inhaled therapy is effective in reducing the risk of CID in COPD, although such a protective effect may be affected in older patients with impaired lung function. Further studies specifically designed on CID in COPD are needed to confirm these results.

Strategies for overcoming the biological barriers associated with the administration of inhaled monoclonal antibodies for lung diseases.

INTRODUCTION: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) should be administered by inhalation rather than parenterally to improve their efficiency in lung diseases. However, the pulmonary administration of mAbs in terms of aerosol technology and the formulation for inhalation is difficult. AREAS COVERED: The feasible or suitable strategies for overcoming the barriers associated with administering mAbs are described. EXPERT OPINION: Providing mAbs via inhalation to individuals with lung disorders is still difficult. However, inhalation is a desirable method for mAb delivery. Inhaled mAb production needs to be well thought out. The illness, the patient group(s), the therapeutic molecule selected, its interaction with the biological barriers in the lungs, the formulation, excipients, and administration systems must all be thoroughly investigated. Therefore, to create inhaled mAbs that are stable and efficacious, it will be essential to thoroughly examine the problems linked to instability and protein aggregation. More excipients will also need to be manufactured, expanding the range of formulation design choices. Another crucial requirement is for novel carriers for topical delivery to the lungs since carriers might significantly enhance proteins' stability and pharmacokinetic profile.

A comprehensive overview of investigational elastase inhibitors for the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Excessive activity of neutrophil elastase (NE), the main enzyme present in azurophil granules in the neutrophil cytoplasm, may cause tissue injury and remodeling in various lung diseases, including acute lung injury (ALI)/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), in which it is crucial to the immune response and inflammatory process. Consequently, NE is a possible target for therapeutic intervention in ALI/ARDS. AREAS COVERED: The protective effects of several NE inhibitors in attenuating ALI/ARDS in several models of lung injury are described. Some of these NE inhibitors are currently in clinical development, but only sivelestat has been evaluated as a treatment for ALI/ARDS. EXPERT OPINION: Preclinical research has produced encouraging information about using NE inhibitors. Nevertheless, only sivelestat has been approved for this clinical indication, and only in Japan and South Korea because of the conflicting results of clinical trials and likely also because of the potential adverse events. Identifying subsets of patients with ARDS most likely to benefit from NE inhibitor treatment, such as the hyperinflammatory phenotype, and using a more advanced generation of NE inhibitors than sivelestat could enable better clinical results than those obtained with elastase inhibitors.

Detection of Small Airway Dysfunction in Asthmatic Patients by Spirometry and Impulse Oscillometry System.

BACKGROUND: There is no gold standard in diagnosing SAD. Indicators of SAD are considered: (a) a value <65% of predicted values of two of three measures, FEF25-75, FEF50 e FEF75 (FEF+); (b) a value of FEV3/FEV6 < LLN (FEV3/FEV6+); (c) an IOS value of R5-R20 >0.07 kPa·s·L-1 (R5-R20+). AIM AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to ascertain, in asthmatic patients, whether spirometry and IOS indicators agree in detecting SAD. We also assessed the relationship between spirometry and IOS indicators and clinical features of asthma. METHODS: We prospectively recruited adult asthmatic patients. Anthropometric and clinical characteristics were recorded. All patients performed spirometry and IOS tests. RESULTS: We enrolled 301 asthmatic patients (179 females; mean age 50 ± 16 years) with normal to moderately severe degree of airway obstruction; 91% were non-smokers, 74% were atopic, 28% had an exacerbation in the previous year, and 18% had a poor asthma control by ACT. SAD was diagnosed in 62% of patients through FEF+, in 40% through FEV3/FEV6+ and in 41% through R5-R20+. κ values were 0.49 between FEF+ and FEV3/FEV6+, 0.20 between FEF+ and R5-R20+, 0.07 between FEV3/FEV6+ and R5-R20+. R5-R20+ but not FEF+ and FEV3/FEV6+ was significantly associated with ACT score (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that in mild to moderately severe asthmatic patients, spirometry and IOS indicators are complementary in diagnosing SAD. Additionally, IOS indicator, but not spirometry ones, was related to asthma control.

Assessing the relationship between cardiovascular and small airway disease and acute events in COPD: The ARCADIA study protocol.

The initial alterations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) involve the small airways. Small airway disease (SAD) is related to lung hyperinflation and air trapping. Several lung function tests may detect the presence of SAD, namely forced mid-expiratory flows, residual volume (RV), RV/total lung capacity (TLC) ratio, functional residual capacity, airway resistances obtained with body-plethysmography and oscillometry, and the single-breath nitrogen washout test. Additionally, high-resolution computed tomography can detect SAD. In addition to SAD, COPD is related to cardiovascular disease (CVD) such as heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. No studies have assessed the relationship between CVD, COPD, and SAD. Therefore, the main objective of the Assessing the Relationship between Cardiovascular and small Airway Disease and Acute events in COPD (ARCADIA) study is to assess the risk of CVD in COPD patients according to SAD in a real-life setting. The correlation between CVD, mortality, and acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) is also evaluated. ARCADIA is a 52-week prospective, multicentre, pilot, observational, cohort study conducted in ≥22 pulmonary centres in Italy and that enrols ≥500 COPD patients, regardless of disease severity (protocol registration: ISRCTN49392136). SAD is evaluated at baseline, after that CVD, mortality, and AECOPD are recorded at 6 and 12 months. Bayesian inference is used to quantify the risk and correlation of the investigated outcomes in COPD patients according to SAD. The ARCADIA study provides relevant findings in the daily clinical management of COPD patients.

Cardiovascular diseases or type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic airway diseases: mutual pharmacological interferences.

Chronic airway diseases (CAD), mainly asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), are frequently associated with different comorbidities. Among them, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) pose problems for the simultaneous treatment of CAD and comorbidity. Indeed, there is evidence that some drugs used to treat CAD negatively affect comorbidity, and, conversely, some drugs used to treat comorbidity may aggravate CAD. However, there is also growing evidence of some beneficial effects of CAD drugs on comorbidities and, conversely, of the ability of some of those used to treat comorbidity to reduce the severity of lung disease. In this narrative review, we first describe the potential cardiovascular risks and benefits for patients using drugs to treat CAD and the potential lung risks and benefits for patients using drugs to treat CVD. Then, we illustrate the possible negative and positive effects on T2DM of drugs used to treat CAD and the potential negative and positive impact on CAD of drugs used to treat T2DM. The frequency with which CAD and CVD or T2DM are associated requires not only considering the effect that drugs used for one disease condition may have on the other but also providing an opportunity to develop therapies that simultaneously favorably impact both diseases.

Pharmacokinetic considerations surrounding triple therapy for uncontrolled asthma.

INTRODUCTION: Solid pharmacological rationale and clinical evidence support the use of a combination of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), a long-acting ß2-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist in severe asthma, which clinically results in increased lung function, improved symptoms, and decreased exacerbation rates. AREAS COVERED: We examined the pharmacokinetic issues associated with triple therapy for uncontrolled asthma. We considered the pharmacokinetic characteristics of the three drug classes, the role of inhalers in influencing their pharmacokinetic behavior, and the impact of severe asthma on the pharmacokinetics of inhaled drugs. EXPERT OPINION: The pharmacokinetics of ICSs and bronchodilators are not affected to a great extent by severe asthma, according to a detailed review of the currently accessible literature. Compared to healthy people, patients with severe asthma show only minor variations in a few pharmacokinetic characteristics, which are unlikely to have therapeutic significance and do not require particular attention. However, the difficulty of obtaining pharmacokinetic profiles of the three drugs included in a triple therapy suggests that the clinical response should be followed over time, which can be considered a good surrogate indicator of whether the drugs have reached sufficient concentrations in the lung to exert a valid pharmacological action.

Experimental drugs in clinical trials for COPD: artificial intelligence via machine learning approach to predict the successful advance from early-stage development to approval.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic advances in drug therapy of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) really effective in suppressing the pathological processes underlying the disease deterioration are still needed. Artificial Intelligence (AI) via Machine Learning (ML) may represent an effective tool to predict clinical development of investigational agents. AREAL COVERED: Experimental drugs in Phase I and II development for COPD from early 2014 to late 2022 were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Different ML models, trained from prior knowledge on clinical trial success, were used to predict the probability that experimental drugs will successfully advance toward approval in COPD, according to Bayesian inference as follows: ≤25% low probability, >25% and ≤50% moderate probability, >50% and ≤75% high probability, and >75% very high probability. EXPERT OPINION: The Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest ML models indicated that, among the current experimental drugs in clinical trials for COPD, only the bifunctional muscarinic antagonist - ß2-adrenoceptor agonists (MABA) navafenterol and batefenterol, the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/MABA fluticasone furoate/batefenterol, and the bifunctional phosphodiesterase (PDE) 3/4 inhibitor ensifentrine resulted to have a moderate to very high probability of being approved in the next future, however not before 2025.

Delivering monoclonal antibodies via inhalation: a systematic review of clinical trials in asthma and COPD.

INTRODUCTION: Advances in understanding the pathophysiology of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) led to investigation of biologic drugs targeting specific inflammatory pathways. No biologics are licensed for COPD while all the approved monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for severe asthma treatment are systemically administered. Systemic administration is associated with low target tissue exposure and risk of systemic adverse events. Thus, delivering mAbs via inhalation may be an attractive approach for asthma and COPD treatment due to direct targeting of the airways. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review of randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluated the potential role of delivering mAbs via inhalation in asthma and COPD treatment. Five RCTs were deemed eligible for a qualitative analysis. EXPERT OPINION: Compared to systemic administration, delivering mAbs via inhalation is associated with rapid onset of action, greater efficacy at lower doses, minimal systemic exposure, and lower risk of adverse events. Although some of the inhaled mAbs included in this study showed a certain level of efficacy and safety in asthmatic patients, delivering mAbs via inhalation is still challenging and controversial. Further adequately powered and well-designed RCTs are needed to assess the potential role of inhaled mAbs in the treatment of asthma and COPD.